Shopping Cart
Item	CE Hours	Total
Totals	0	$0.00

Prevention of Medical Errors

This course meets Florida''s mandatory medical error prevention instruction requirements.

About the Authors

Peggy M. Goulding, Ph.D., received a doctoral degree in educational psychology from the University of Texas at Austin and completed a post-doctoral program in clinical neuropsychology at the University of Houston. She has over twenty years of professional experience in a variety of settings, including state, local and Federal government; private industry; hospitals; rehabilitation facilities; nursing homes; and public and private schools.

Exerpts prepared by Shelda Hudson, RN, BSN, PHN. Ms. Hudson''s responsible for directing the activities of this department, selecting qualified, credentialed authors for the courses offered by the National Center as well as advising staff of required course design and criteria. Ms. Hudson has over 18 years of extensive experience.

Purpose and Goals

The goal of the enclosed course is to provide health care professionals with an overview of the problem of medical errors, factors contributing to the occurrence of these errors, and steps that can be taken by institutions and individual care providers to reduce medical errors in key care settings.

Instructional Objectives

Upon completion of this course, the motivated student should be able to:

1. Delineate factors contributing to the occurrence of medical errors
2. Outline error prone situations and vulnerabilities among special populations
3. Identify processes for improvement of patient outcome
4. Recognize caregivers' responsibilities for reporting medical errors
5. Name methods to increase public awareness of medical errors and how to prevent them

Introduction

Patient safety is one of the Nation''s most pressing health care challenges. A historical monumental report by the Institute of Medicine of the National Academy of Sciences (IOM), dropped a bombshell on the health care community and the general public alike with its publication of "To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System". While evidence of medical error has existed for some time, and has long been acknowledged within the medical community, the report captured the public''s attention by revealing the magnitude of this pervasive problem and presenting it convincingly. The information presented in the report is not new. Many studies, some nearly fifty years old, have shown that patients were frequently injured by the same medical care that was intended to help them.

Despite some improvements following the study, not enough has been done to curb the epidemic of medical errors; studies show billions of dollars are wasted each year and thousands of lives are needlessly lost.

Subsequent studies suggest that the medical error rate is even higher. These statistics are a call to action for health care professionals to explore creative ways to implement patient safety practices in their systems and procedures.

In addition to this terrible human toll, medical errors and the problems they can cause – including bed sores, post-op infections and implant or device complications – cost the U.S. economy $19.5 billion in 2008, according to a study released in August 2010. The report estimates the errors caused more than 2,500 avoidable deaths and over 10 million lost days of work. Moreover, fear of becoming a victim of medical error may lead patients to delay obtaining potentially beneficial medical care, which may allow their illnesses to worsen.

Many of these adverse events are associated with the use of pharmaceuticals, and are potentially preventable. Each year, patients in the United States experience at least 1.5 million preventable injuries due to medication errors, according to the findings of an Institute of Medicine analysis. All of us can recall at least one or two sensational stories in newspapers, on television, or in magazine articles of a tragic medical error that has forever changed the life of the victim and his family.

The perception of medical errors among health care providers and the public has been shaped over the years primarily by such anecdotal reports in the popular press, and the proposed remedies have generally focused on fixing blame on individual providers, including health plans, hospitals, doctors, pharmacists, nurses, and other caregivers. However, the IOM report concludes that the majority of medical errors are the result of systemic problems rather than poor performance by individual providers, and thus has created a whole new approach to preventing medical mistakes and improving patient safety.

Defining & Recognizing Medical Errors

An error is defined as the failure of a planned action to be completed as intended or the use of a wrong plan to achieve an aim. Errors can include problems in practice, products, procedures, and systems. Errors are important because of their potential effect on patient safety. The enhancement of patient safety thus encompasses three related activities: preventing errors, making errors visible, and mitigating the effects of errors.

Not all bad outcomes for patients are due to medical errors. Patients may not be cured of their disease or disability despite the fact that they are provided optimal care. Likewise, not all adverse events that are the result of medical care are, in fact, errors. An adverse event is defined broadly as an injury that was caused by medical management and that resulted in measurable disability. Some adverse events result from a complication that cannot be prevented given the current state of knowledge. For example, many drugs, even when used appropriately, have a chance of side effects, such as nausea from administration of a chemotherapy agent. A case of severe nausea would be an adverse event, but it would not be considered a medical error to have given the chemotherapy medication if it was otherwise indicated for the patient''s treatment. Medical errors are adverse events that are preventable with our current state of medical knowledge.

Consideration of errors is usually expanded beyond preventable adverse events that lead to actual patient harm to include near misses, also sometimes referred to as close calls. A near miss is an event or situation that could have resulted in an accident, injury, or illness, but did not, either by chance or through timely intervention. Experience in other industries, including aviation, manufacturing, and nuclear energy, demonstrates that there is as much to learn from close calls as there is from incidents leading to actual harm.

The process by which medical errors are identified and addressed varies from institution to institution. However, many facilities utilize an approach called root cause analysis. This tool is part of an overall process for identifying prevention strategies by focusing on changes that need to be made to health care delivery systems. Root cause analysis involves those who are most familiar with the problem situation and encourages them to dig deeper into the problem by asking "why" at each stage of cause and effect. Human factors as well as the impact of related processes and systems are taken into account. The immediate goal of the root cause analysis is to generate specific prevention strategies, but it also is designed to foster a culture of safety in the organization that uses it. The technique is used in the Veterans Health Administration hospitals and clinics around the country. It has also been recommended for use in conjunction with the evaluation of sentinel events to be reported to the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO).

Factors Contributing to Medical Errors

The rate of health care errors is far higher than the error rate in the other industries listed above, which also rely on systems that include the interaction of humans and technology to perform a number of functions leading to an outcome. Although there are similarities, health care is distinct in its complexity. For example, Leape noted in 1994 that a patient in an intensive care unit is the recipient of an average of 178 different activities performed per day that rely on the interaction of monitoring, treatment, and support systems.

The decentralized and fragmented nature of the American health care industry also contributes to the problem of errors, as can be illustrated by the process of prescription and delivery of medications. The medication process requires the successful completion of at least five interdependent steps: ordering, transcribing, dispensing, delivering, and administering. Poor system design can create numerous opportunities for error in any one of these steps.

Organizational factors may also contribute significantly to the occurrence of medical errors. Within many hospitals, departments are only loosely linked, and communications between primary care doctors and medical specialists are notoriously poor. As a result, information on problems, as well as improved practices to reduce errors and enhance safety, in one department or one facility do not migrate quickly to others. The variety of settings in which health care is provided (including hospitals, nursing homes, clinics, ambulatory surgery centers, private offices, and patients'' homes) and the transitions of patients and providers among them provide additional challenges.

Errors may be especially difficult to recognize in health care because variations in individuals'' responses to treatment are expected. Medical professionals may not recognize that a particular product or procedure contributed to or caused the problem because the patient is already ill, the product is not expected to work perfectly at all times, or the event appears unrelated to the product or procedure. Lack of recognition of a service''s role in adverse events reduces reporting of the association and the opportunity to learn from previous experiences with the product. Because medical errors usually affect only a single patient at a time, they are treated as isolated incidents, and little public attention is drawn to these problems when compared with aviation or nuclear power accidents. Health care errors are also underreported due to liability and confidentiality concerns.

Perhaps the greatest barrier to the improvement of patient safety through reduction of medical error, however, has been due to the professional culture within the healthcare community. Adverse medical events have existed since the beginning of organized medical practice, but may not have been recognized at the time of their occurrence. When errors were recognized, they were invariably attributed to mistakes by individual practitioners; and the naming, blaming, and shaming approach to dealing with errors limited effective problem resolution.

The IOM reports make it clear that the majority of medical errors today are not produced by provider negligence, lack of education, or lack of training. Rather, errors occur in our health care systems due to poor systems design and organizational factors, much as in any other industry. For example, health care workers are sometimes expected to work 24-hour shifts to ensure patients are cared for and have some continuity of care, although it is known that overwork and fatigue lead to decreased mental concentration and alertness. They are expected to rely on their memories and deliver safe care without substantial investments in information technology or even the simple application of checklists. They often deliver care through a set of complex processes, although industry has shown that the probability of performing a task perfectly decreases as the number of steps in the process increases. Finally, they are expected to work in a climate where one error, even if not preventable, may mean a catastrophe or the end of a career. Improvement of the systems by which medicine is practiced will therefore be necessary to reduce the incidence of medical error.

Common Problem Areas and Possible Solutions

Medication Errors

Almost everyone in the modern world takes medication at one time or another. According to one estimate, in any given week, four out of five U.S. adults will use prescription medicines, OTC drugs, or vitamin/mineral, herbal supplement of some sort, and nearly one-third adults will take five or more different medications.

Most of the time these medications are beneficial, or at least they cause no harm, but on occasion they do injure the person taking them. Some of these adverse drug events (ADEs) are inevitable–the more powerful the drug, the more likely it is to have harmful side effects.

Another major area of medical error is the improper administration of medications. When all types of errors are taken into account, a hospital patient can expect on average to be subjected to more than one medication error each day. However, substantial variations in error rates are found across facilities.

One study estimated 380,000 preventable ADEs in hospitals each year, another estimated 450,000, and the committee believes that both are likely to be underestimates. The numbers are equally disturbing in other settings. One study calculates, for example, that 800,000 preventable ADEs occur each year in long-term care facilities. Another finds that among outpatient Medicare patients there occur 530,000 preventable ADEs each year. And the evidence suggests that both of these numbers are likely to be underestimates as well. Furthermore, none of these studies includes errors of omission–failures to prescribe medication in cases where it should be. Taking all of these numbers into account, the committee concludes that there are at least 1.5 million preventable ADEs that occur in the United States each year. The true number may be much higher. (IOM, 2007)

In some instances the errors originate with the order itself: it may be illegible, incomplete (e.g., 650 mg Tylenol - no route, no frequency indicated), or blatantly incorrect (5 mg Lanoxin po, qd, when in reality only 0.5 mg was meant).

Name confusion is another common cause of drug related errors. For example, the antiepileptic drug Lamictal has often been confused for the antifungal drug Lamisil. The volume of errors involving the two drugs was so large that Glaxo Wellcome, Lamictal''s manufacturer, launched a campaign to warn pharmacists of possible errors. There have also been countless reports of confusion among the arthritis drug Celebrex, the anticonvulsant Cerebyx, and the antidepressant Celexa; fortunately none of these has resulted in serious harm to a patient.

Under the FDA''s authority to regulate drug labeling, the agency evaluates medicine brand names and works with the drug company to change the product''s name if necessary to avoid confusion. FDA is also developing new standards to prevent name confusion, and to reduce similar-appearing drug packaging.

Some medical centers have begun using computer programs and other systems supports to double-check care decisions by doctors and nurses. Even simple computer systems that replace handwritten prescriptions with electronic ones have resulted in substantial error reductions. Bar coding systems have been developed in which the patient, nurse, and medication have ID strips which can be scanned to verify that the drug is being given correctly and will not cause drug interactions. Also, storage of concentrated potassium chloride, large containers of insulin, and other potentially hazardous medications is now recommended well away from patient care areas. Still, the vigilance of the health care provider is often key to the medication process. One of the many ways a nurse is expected to safeguard a patient is to know all about the medications to be administered. This knowledge includes the medication name, action, use, dose, route, elimination, side effects, contraindications, and nursing considerations. If the nurse is unsure about any of these points, the answer should be obtained before the medication is administered.

Other nursing considerations include teaching the patient about the medications he is receiving, administering only those medications which you have personally prepared, taking a thorough drug history to include allergies, and being aware of potential drug-drug and drug-food interactions. Medication errors and idiosyncratic reactions should be noted on an incident report and in the nurse''s notes, and the physician and the supervisor should be informed.

Special Populations

Children have been shown to be particularly vulnerable to medication errors. Such errors have been shown to be common in pediatric hospital settings, with the rate for potential adverse drug events three times higher for children than for adults. Doses of children''s medications are determined by weight, and the extra calculations involved leave room for possible error. Also, few drugs have been specifically tested for pediatric use, so physicians often must estimate dosages in order to treat children. It may be difficult to get children to cooperate adequately with various aspects of care. Lack of familiarity among health care providers with standards of care for rare pediatric illnesses may also lead to medical error.

The elderly also seem to be particularly vulnerable to medical error; this has been attributed to the increased complexity of their care rather than to any systemic discrimination against provision of good care to this age group. As with most patient populations, a major source of adverse events in the elderly is medication error. Cardiovascular drugs are the leading class of drugs that produce adverse drug reactions in the elderly, followed by central nervous system active agents, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), endocrine agents, anti-infectives, gastrointestinal agents, respiratory agents, and blood formation and coagulation agents. Surprisingly, warfarin, despite its narrow therapeutic index, causes the lowest number of adverse drug events. Polypharmacy is a significant concern in the care of elderly patients and can lead to hospitalizations for gastrointestinal bleeds, falls resulting in fracture, low blood sugars, and dehydration.

The Patient Safety and Quality Improvement Act of 2005

This Act was created in response to growing concern about patient safety in the United States. It creates Patient Safety Organizations (PSOs) to collect, aggregate, and analyze confidential information reported by health care providers.

Currently, patient safety improvement efforts are often hampered by the fear of discovery of peer deliberations, resulting in under-reporting of events and an inability to combine sufficient patient safety event data for analysis. By analyzing patient safety event information, PSOs will be able to identify patterns of failures and propose measures to eliminate patient safety risks and hazards. It encourages voluntary reporting of errors without fear of retribution.

Data, stripped of identifiers, will be maintained by public or private entities. The analysis of the information collected will be used to improve medical systems and practice. This is a common-sense law that gives legal protections to health professionals who report their practices to patient safety organizations. By providing critical information about medical procedures, health care professionals can help others learn from their experiences.

By analyzing patient safety event information, PSOs will be able to identify patterns of failures and propose measures to eliminate patient safety risks and hazards.

Patient Safety and Medical Liability Reform: Putting the Patient First

Over the past 30 years, a great deal of attention has been paid to our Nation''s system for handling medical error claims. The experience of health care organizations since publication of the IOM report has led to some consensus on the necessary components of effective error prevention systems. In an effort to help eliminate or reduce these risks the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) allocated large sums of grant money to implement and evaluate patient safety approaches and liability reforms. The grants test models that

• Put patient safety first and work to reduce preventable injuries.
• Foster better communication between doctors and their patients.
• Ensure that patients are compensated in a fair and timely manner for medical injuries, while also reducing the incidence of frivolous lawsuits.
• Reduce liability premiums.

The foundation for such systems needs to rest on thoughtfully developed programs within local health care organizations, managed and directed by local personnel. These programs should be complemented by coordinated, external support and guidance from Federal, State, and non-governmental agencies and organizations.

What are National Patient Safety Goals and why are they important?

National Patient Safety Goals are a series of specific actions that accredited organizations are required to take in order to prevent medical errors such as miscommunication among caregivers, unsafe use of infusion pumps, and medication mix-ups. A panel of national safety experts has determined that taking these simple, proven steps will reduce the frequency of devastating medical errors.

2011 National Patient Safety Goals (JCAHO)

The purpose of the National Patient Safety Goals is to improve patient safety. The goals focus on problems in health care safety and how to solve them.

Ambulatory Care/ Home Care

1. Identify patients correctly

Use at least two ways to identify patients. For example, use the patient''s name and date of birth. This is done to make sure that each patient gets the correct medicine and treatment.

Make sure that the correct patient gets the correct blood when they get a blood transfusion.

2. Use medicines safely

Before a procedure, label medicines that are not labeled. For example, medicines in syringes, cups and basins. Do this in the area where medicines and supplies are set up.

Take extra care with patients who take medicines to thin their blood.

Record and pass along correct information about a patient''s medicines. Find out what medicines the patient is taking. Compare those medicines to new medicines given to the patient. Make sure the patient knows which medicines to take when they are at home. Tell the patient it is important to bring their up-to-date list of medicines every time they visit a doctor.

3. Prevent infection

Use the hand cleaning guidelines from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention or the World Health Organization. Set goals for improving hand cleaning. Use the goals to improve hand cleaning.

Use proven guidelines to prevent infection after surgery.

4. Prevent mistakes in surgery

Make sure that the correct surgery is done on the correct patient and at the correct place on the patient''s body.

Mark the correct place on the patient''s body where the surgery is to be done. Pause before the surgery to make sure that a mistake is not being made.

5. Prevent patient safety risks

Find out which patients are most likely to fall. For example, is the patient taking any medicines that might make them weak, dizzy or sleepy? Take action to prevent falls for these patients.

Find out if there are any risks for patients who are getting oxygen. For example, fires in the patient''s home.

Find out which patients are most likely to try to commit suicide.

Long-Term Care

The Same goals are appropriate as in Ambulatory Care/ Home Care, but in addition:

1. Prevent bed sores

Find out which residents are most likely to have bed sores. Take action to prevent bed sores in these patients. From time to time, re-check residents for bed sores.

Note: This is an easy-to-read document. It has been created for the public. The exact language of the goals can be found at www.jointcommission.org

Reporting Responsibilities

Currently, several databases exist that collect information on specific types of errors, such as the Center for Disease Control and Prevention''s hospital acquired infections reporting systems, the Food and Drug Administration''s adverse drug and device event reporting systems, and JCAHO''s sentinel event system. Individual institutions or health care systems may have their own internal data collection system, such as that at the Veterans Health Administration. A number of states have also implemented systems for facilities within their boundaries. Unfortunately, all of these systems have been limited by underreporting of adverse events, and the problem is especially severe for systems designed to hold organizations or individuals accountable for bad outcomes. In order for any system for reduction of medical errors to be effective, it is essential that errors be reported and evaluated. Effective programs need to incorporate protection from legal discovery and liability, which cause errors to be concealed.

Basic tenets of a successful reporting system are that those who report must feel safe in doing so and that their confidentiality must be protected. Reporting systems in which these factors are missing are generally unsuccessful in obtaining data, inaccurate, and incomplete. The question "Who did it?" is not important. However, it is critical to find out what happened, why it happened, and how it can be prevented in the future.

The IOM recommends a two-tier error reporting system: a nationwide, state-based system that includes mandatory reporting of mistakes that result in death or serious injury, and a voluntary reporting system for other medical mistakes, including those so-called close calls or near misses. Considerable support exists for Federal and State legislation that protects provider and patient confidentiality, while safeguarding the legal remedies of those whose health has been harmed.

The Role of the Healthcare Professional

The frequency and types of medical errors are well documented, but less is known about potential errors that were intercepted by nurses. What about the type, frequency, and potential harm of recovered medical errors reported by registered nurses?

Nurses are known to protect patients from harm. Several studies on medical errors found that there would have been more medical errors reaching the patient had not potential errors been caught earlier by nurses.

A study completed by Nursing Informatics and Research, Partners HealthCare System, in 2010 used The Recovered Medical Error Inventory, a 25-item empirically derived and internally consistent (alpha =.90) list of medical errors, was posted on the Internet. Participants were recruited via e-mail and healthcare-related listservs using a nonprobability snowball sampling technique. Investigators e-mailed contacts working in hospitals or who managed healthcare-related listservs and asked the contacts to pass the link on to others with contacts in acute care settings.

The results showed that during 1 year, 345 CCRNs reported that they recovered 18,578 medical errors, of which they rated 4,183 as potentially lethal. CONCLUSION: Surveillance, clinical judgment, and interventions by CCRNs to identify, interrupt, and correct medical errors protected seriously ill patients from harm.

Role of the Patient in Prevention of Medical Errors

Well-informed patients are key participants in the effort to enhance the quality and safety of American health care. The right question from a patient at the right time may be the intervention that averts an error. Initiatives have been undertaken to encourage programs geared to education of the individual patient as well as the public at large.

An example of the latter is the Food and Drug Administration''s "Take Time to Care" program, a national public awareness campaign about safe medicine use.

Reducing preventable ADEs will demand the attention and active involvement of everyone involved. This effort will pay off in far fewer medical errors and preventable adverse drug events, far less harm done to patients by medications, and far less cost to the nation''s economy.

This patient fact sheet covers ways for the patient to reduce risks associated with medicines, hospital stays, and surgeries, as well as other useful recommendations. A copy of the Patient Education Sheet is provided as Appendix A.

Review: 10/2014