|
First,
because of a stressful event or series of events, the individual experiences
a rise in tension and an inability to organize his behavior successfully
enough to solve the problem. The individual experiences this lack of success
in handling the tension, which in turn increases it. Existing internal
and external resources are then mobilized. If successful, the mobilization
results in diminished or solved problems as the individual uses emergency
coping mechanisms; defines the problem in a new way; or gives up the goal
as unreachable. If the problem cannot be solved or avoided, major personal
disorganization may take place, manifested by anxiety, depression, confusion,
or lack of impulse control, leading to suicidal or violent behavior.
One
of the factors contributing to the restoration of equilibrium is situational
support, provided primarily by people to whom the distressed person can
turn. A social network of close friends and family members can mean a
great deal in weathering the storm of a crisis situation. This is a resource
that nurses should recognize and encourage.
For
those people lacking interpersonal resources, the health care system and
professional workers can become a support system. Emergency facilities,
hot lines, crisis centers, and drop-in clinics have support systems as
part of their services. An important goal beyond emergency intervention
is to help the person develop autonomous support systems.
Physical
aspects of support include the creature comforts of warmth, food, and
shelter, as well as a balance between environmental stimulation and deprivation.
One explanation for the degree of psychiatric disturbance in an intensive
care unit, for example, is the level of incoming sensory stimulation from
machines, lights, and action. The person may be overloaded and respond
temporarily with psychotic disorganization.
Coping
mechanisms are the individual's habitual patterns of dealing with stress
and other problems. They are generally characteristic of a person and
may occur on a conscious or subconscious level. Coping mechanisms are
what a person usually does to solve problems or feel better. In the formation
of a crisis, a person's usual patterns may not be working or the person
may not be able to use them. Even psychotic behavior is a primitive form
of coping and may bring the response of help and treatment from others.
One
of the most common coping mechanisms involves turning to others for support.
Our earliest, most primitive way of handling anxiety was to turn to mother,
and this response was adapted as we matured to include other sources of
support such as friends, spouse, medical personnel, and clergy.
Physical
movement and sustained action often result in tension relief; a variety
of repetitive activities may be incorporated into coping mechanisms, including
pacing, coughing, scratching, moving about restlessly, engaging in pointless
overactivity, finger tapping, experiencing increased urination and defecation,
increased sexual behavior, fighting, hand wringing, eating, smoking, using
drugs and alcohol, playing sports, swimming, taking a long warm bath,
having a massage, or being rocked. More complex activity patterns may
also serve this purpose, including such things as cleaning the house,
gambling, fast driving, or going on a shopping spree. Repetitive vocalizations
provide tension relief for some individuals; these may include screaming,
cursing, crying, joking, laughing, "talking it out." Indeed, repetitive
themes in routine conversation and rapid, "pressured" speech are often
symptoms of significant psychological distress.
A
variety of mental processes have been identified that can serve as coping
mechanisms, including fantasy, imagination, dreams, daydreams, mental
rehearsing, lies, and humor. Ego defense mechanisms are more elaborate
processes and are more likely to arise in the face of more serious, ongoing
stressors. These include denial, repression, suppression, compensation,
rationalization, reaction formation, projection, intellectualization and
regression.
Practice
of Crisis Intervention
Crisis
intervention in psychiatric emergency situations is divided into four
steps: assessment of the individual and his current problems, determination
of the therapeutic intervention, intervention, and resolution
of the crisis and anticipatory planning for the future. In actual practice,
the steps are overlapping rather than consecutive. Also, the concept of
crisis intervention may follow through in more than one place. For example,
a person may call a crisis worker saying that he has made a suicide attempt
with pills. The worker assesses the immediate situation and instructs
a friend of the person to bring the person at once to the emergency room.
There, medical evaluation and an extended suicide evaluation are done.
Depending on the outcome, the person is referred for continued crisis
work by the appropriate therapist, is hospitalized to prevent a further
psychiatric emergency, or is discharged. The crisis model operates in
many areas of medicine and nursing.
Assessment:
First and foremost, it is necessary to assess the individual to determine
if a crisis does exist and its degree of severity. This is done during
the initial interview, which reviews the immediate present. The precipitating
events and the person's ability to cope are evaluated.
Sometimes
initial assessment shows there is no true crisis. The person may be in
no particular discomfort and may be seeking treatment for other reasons:
avoiding jail, punishing a spouse, getting drugs to maintain a habit,
seeking compensation for an injury, getting a letter for disability or
for release from responsibilities. In these cases, the coping devices
have not failed. Instead, the person is using a characteristic pattern
of manipulation to meet needs, and the crisis worker clarifies what is
possible and available and what is not.
During
the initial interview, the crisis worker should appear calm, interested,
confident and resourceful. This may sound easier or harder to do than
it is. One thing to remember is that most people in psychiatric emergencies
really do want help. They are frightened and eager for relief. It is important
to acknowledge the patient's sense of urgency, while providing assurance
that there is time to work out the problems. The patient must know that
help is available, that there are solutions to be explored and used. The
crisis worker must be an active, involved participant. This style of interviewing
is more direct, empathic and active than traditional styles of psychotherapy
in which the main thrust is taken by the patient and silence is used as
a therapeutic technique. The crisis worker often develops a pattern of
setting the framework for the interview, encouraging the patient to express
thoughts and concerns with attention paid to feelings, directly asking
for needed information, stating back to the patient and family what the
problems seem to be, and suggesting treatment options.
Determination
of the therapeutic intervention: This is the data-gathering
and treatment-planning component in handling the immediate crisis. In
deciding what type of intervention is most appropriate, it is important
to consider precipitating factors, the amount of disruption in the person's
life, the duration of the problem, and its impact on others.
The
health care professional must concentrate on the events within the previous
six-week period. If the patient goes back much further, he/she may be
attempting to avoid, deny or confuse present events. Ask until clear,
"Why now?" It is important to determine when the person was last adequately
functioning, and specifically what happened to disrupt the balance. Memory
is better for current events, and the events are less likely to be distorted.
This is true of the patient as well as relatives, friends and co-workers.
For people who want to delve extensively into the past, it is best to
tell them gently that these are issues they may bring up in the future,
especially if they go into psychotherapy.
It
is important in this first emergency interview to determine if medication
for immediate relief is necessary. Sometimes medication is essential before
the assessment interview if the person is highly agitated or hostile.
Another
important focus for decision-making is whether or not hospitalization
is necessary. This is decided based upon:
- the degree of anxiety or depression,
- the ability of the person to maintain control of impulses to hurt
self or others and
- the availability of other people to provide emotional and practical
support.
In
an emergency room a man was markedly anxious and agitated, showing poor
judgment and unable to sleep. The diagnosis was a manic episode. It was
decided that he would not have to be hospitalized as long as he could
follow this treatment plan: Begin appropriate medication; come daily to
the Day Center; drink no alcoholic beverages; and discontinue sailing
his boat, on which he lived. He and his family agreed to this contract.
Over the first weekend, the nurse made a "boat call" to check on any adverse
reactions to the medication, to reinforce the expectations about the boat
and drinking and to further her therapeutic relationship with him by showing
her concern.
Intervention:
This third stage begins as soon as the person presents for treatment;
actually, it is part of the first two stages but continues after they
are completed. As individuals in crisis share what they perceive is happening,
they often experience some immediate relief simply from having someone
listen. People who have been struggling with feelings of depression, anxiety,
hopelessness, and a battery of unpleasant physical symptoms often feel
much better after talking, obtaining some release of feelings and getting
direct and indirect reassurance that help is available.
In
many instances, it is essential that patients deal with feelings before
they can do any problem solving on an intellectual basis. The crisis worker
can describe the discomfort by saying something like, "I can see you're
very unhappy (angry, afraid, anxious, etc.)." Or an educated guess might
help: "Most people in your situation would feel very angry" or "You must
feel very confused by the mixed messages you're getting."
The
crisis worker gives permission and encouragement for the patient to experience,
recognize and express emotions. For many people this is an unusual experience.
Many people are not in touch with the feelings behind their extreme discomfort.
With the death of a loved one, the griever may be completely unaware of
feelings of rejection, anger, guilt and resentment. A mother may be consciously
aware of her happiness over the marriage of her last child and bewildered
by feelings of depression and anxiety.
As
the patient experiences some relief and begins to explore the immediate
situation, some understanding occurs, but a full realization of the link
between precipitating events and responses is not yet clear. The crisis
worker may put a speculated conclusion into words for the person to think
about.
It
is important to identify strengths, abilities and unmet needs. Exploration
into the significant life areas such as work, home, school and relationships
with others will help: What is most distressing and disappointing right
now? What coping mechanisms have been used successfully in the past? Alternative
ways to cope with the current situation may also be suggested.
Throughout
the process of crisis intervention, it is important to focus on the ability
of the patient to regain mastery and to accept responsibility for self.
The crisis worker is an active partner in the problem-solving venture
but continues to give the credit to the patient.
Externalizing
the events in a crisis makes it easier for everyone to take a look at
the factors. The patient may expect that the crisis worker will "figure
me out, know what's best, make me feel better and tell me how to live
happily ever after." If this kind of unrealistic belief in magic and power
is encouraged, it will boomerang. It is important to restore gently the
power of change to the patient and to present the crisis worker as an
ally who will help the person to figure out the problems and possible
solutions.
An
emphasis on positive assets and strengths is an effective tool in resolving
the crisis. What and when was the previous optimal level of performance?
What are the strengths in the patient and the family? What are the advantages
of increased coping? What are the advantages of decreased coping? Can
these advantages be obtained by means successfully used in the past? Many
people in crisis at the time experience only the frightened, helpless,
incapacitated parts of themselves. They forget or neglect the ways in
which they have mastered other life crises.
Strengths
should be identified, encouraged and reinforced. One depressed man, feeling
completely ineffective and nonproductive, was congratulated when he reported
he had driven around town to check on sites of difficult construction
jobs he had completed. In this way, he reminded himself that he had been
capable of working and would be again, despite current feelings of helplessness.
In
crisis intervention, the family and significant others in a person's life
may be enlisted to help in the current situation. Generally, they are
already involved in the complicated social network. The crisis worker
may interview them in the emergency room or call on the phone for information
and contact. It is best to explain the need for these contacts to the
patient and receive his/her consent, but in certain circumstances confidentiality
may be waived if in the patient's best interests. With suicidal persons,
the family needs to know the extent of the problems and risks involved.
With homicidal problems, laws vary as to who should be notified - the
intended victim and the police in some instances. Nurses should know the
laws in their state and their hospital's policies. Some crisis teams make
home visits or ask that the total social network meet together for intensive
planning.
If
the crisis has been precipitated by death, divorce or separation from
a significant person, a step in resolution is to "re-people" the individual's
world. After the initial grief work is done, the person is actively encouraged
to seek out others in old or new social settings. Organized clubs, social
groups, church activities, and recreational settings are places where
potential friends are available.
These
psychological intervention strategies are often supplemented by the use
of psychotropic medications and/or one of a variety of institutional placements.
These options are explored in detail in later sections of the course.
Resolution:
This is the final stage of crisis intervention and generally
takes place within a six-week period. Psychological equilibrium is reestablished,
whether at the previous level, or lower or (hopefully) higher on the mental
health scale. Crisis is often a turning point at which important learning
can take place. Shakespeare noted this in the phrase, "Sweet are the uses
of adversity."
How
well did the crisis intervention work? This is indicated by the answers
to the following questions:
- Have the original presenting symptoms and manifested anxiety decreased
to manageable proportions?
- Does the person feel better?
- Does the person experience more hope and have the ability to cope?
- Do the individuals involved feel they have been helped?
- Have they learned how to approach problem solving more effectively?
- Are previously unmet needs being recognized and satisfied in healthy,
appropriate ways?
- Do the individuals feel able to make it on their own with their own
resources?
- Does the crisis worker have positive feelings about the outcome?
- Can a plan for future action be described?
During
the resolution stage, the crisis worker helps by summarizing the changes,
describing the increased effectiveness in living and encouraging the person
to experience the gains again. To be forewarned is to be forearmed! Future
possible conflicts are discussed, along with possible alternative responses.
It
is important to convey the message that the person is now able to cope
again, using what has been learned from the experience; and if more help
is needed in the future, it will be available. Some patients who have
successfully mastered a crisis feel ashamed if later they again feel unable
to cope. They may feel that they have let the crisis worker down and have
difficulty asking for assistance again. During the resolution period of
crisis intervention, plans for longer-term psychotherapy may be worked
out if indicated, desired and available.
Nursing
Can Be One Crisis After Another
Crisis
theory and crisis intervention are important concepts for nurses in every
clinical setting. People bring their characteristic coping patterns into
any situation. The health/illness continuum provides multiple opportunities
for the development of crisis, including the prospects of sudden alteration
in the ability to function, fear of impending disability or death, sudden
shifting or reversing of social roles, and pain. Illness and accidents
may necessitate sudden shifts in reality with which a person copes in
many ways. Some methods of coping may lead to crisis and psychiatric emergencies.
Nurses
are involved with people in potential crisis situations outside as well
as inside the hospital setting. They see varying needs for crisis intervention
in clinics, doctors' offices, schools, and day centers and in the home.
Also, many areas of nursing are very stressful which may lead to crisis
for the nurse. Nurses must recognize the need to get help when they are
experiencing a crisis. Furthermore, they may see developing crises in
patients and fellow staff. Sensitive, appropriate referral for services
can make a great deal of difference.
In
some crisis centers and mental health settings, nurses function as primary
therapists, working directly with individuals and families. They receive
from and give consultation to other members of the mental health team
or to the general hospital units.
Centers
that specialize in crisis intervention have made deliberate attempts to
reach out to people in distress. Rather than regarding these people as
"sick" or "crazy," they consider them as having difficulty with problems
of living. This kind of agency may be more acceptable to many people than
traditional psychiatric centers. There is less stigma involved.
Many
people have distorted or negative stereotypes of psychiatrists, psychologists
and psychiatric social workers. Their stereotypes of nurses may be more
positive. Nurses are seen as accessible and helping people. They bring
a background of working with emergencies along with an understanding of
family interactions.
On
the other hand, individuals may not realize or accept that nurses are
professionally prepared to help in an emotional crisis. Also, nurses themselves
may feel that this type of therapeutic intervention is beyond their skill.
Actually, whether they know it or not, many nurses are already involved
in various aspects of crisis intervention. With proper educational programs
and adequate supervision, support and guidance, nurses can become even
more competent and confident in crisis intervention.
|